The flurry of
excitement over the P5 + 1 talks in Geneva this week relegated
Israel-Palestinian peace talks to the fringes of diplomatic concern.
With the resumption of Iranian nuclear talks scheduled for 20th
November, the peace process will now return to the forefront of
international thinking. Netanyahu has found propitious circumstances in
which to bury the news of increased settlement building. With focus
concentrated on the fallout from Geneva, the news that 24,000 new homes
are to be built in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, will not receive
the coverage that it merits.
To be
clear, the building of these additional housing units is not yet
imminent. The current stage sees the Israeli Housing Ministry issue
tenders (which it did so at the end of October) for the construction of
new units. These are not the actions of a government committed to making
the decisions vital in driving forward the peace process. It is yet
another example of Netanyahu paying lip service to the idea of a peace
process in theory, but impeding efforts to make any headway.
Most
importantly, tenders have been issued in East Jerusalem for 4,000 new
units, with 1200 issued in the highly sensitive E1 area between
Jerusalem and Ramallah (where the Palestinian Authority is based). Kerry
has re-iterated that the expansion of the settlement program is
illegitimate in the eyes of the US, but nothing is being done to stunt
the mushrooming of further settlements.
Netanyahu has long been a law unto himself. Even
Avigdor Lieberman has called on Netanyahu to mend ailing ties with the
US in recent days. Still, Netanyahu’s expansionist policies fly in the
face of international condemnation of Israeli action in a future
Palestinian state. Fresh from his ridiculous rejection of an as yet
formulated deal at Geneva, Netanyahu continues to force Israel into
plowing a lone furrow towards international isolation, irking his
American paymasters in the process. With the re-introduction of
Lieberman to Israeli politics this week, decision-making at the highest
levels of the Israeli government will only shift even further to the
Right.
Whilst Netanyahu remains in charge, and
there appears little stomach to fight his radicalism, the
Israeli-Palestinian track will remain an intractable issue.
On Iran, though
a deal was not reached this week, the most intense period of diplomatic
activity in the past 30 years must be seen as a positive. The hope
remains that Zarif and Rouhani do not get beaten back by hardliners, and
that Congress remains steadfast in not imposing more sanctions on the
Iranian economy. Removing an Iranian nuclear threat remains an issue of
paramount importance to the global order, but it is a threat that can be
removed.