Vocationally Labour





It is noticeable that, while Gove’s speech is a mixture of theoretical texts and pop cultural references, Twigg draws on empirical studies and comparisons with other countries to make his main points.


Twigg’s text is dotted with the terms ‘vocational’, ‘skills’  ‘employees’,  and ‘business’. These terms appear in almost every sentence; constantly reinforcing his main point concerning the main thrust of his speech.  He emphasises the need for an educational system that; provides vocational training, encourages the development of technical skills, provides real life (worthwhile) work experience, in an establishment that is guided by the needs of big business.


Stephen Twigg’s main focus is with Britain’s supposed skills gap/shortage. His main concern is those students who are falling through the gaps.  Those students who fail to thrive within an academic setting.  His driving motivation is to find ways to solve this problem.   He begins his speech by outlining the history of education; from the three tier grammar/technical/secondary school, to today’s comprehensive/academy schools. He bemoans the fact that successive governments have focused on academic excellence over vocational and technical skills.   He argues that this is one of the main causes of Britain’s skill shortage.  He argues that other countries, such as China, have solved this educational problem and that our inability to do so means that we are falling behind in the tradewars.  We do not have enough skilled workers to fill demand and we do not have enough unskilled jobs to fill the demands of unskilled workers. His main policy proposal is the Technical Baccalaureate..The policy is, therefore, shaped to provide a labour market; to reproduce and expand the skilled workforce, expanding and extending apprenticeship schemes.


Of Course, it must be remembered that the Labour party are not advocating the scrapping of academic learning.  They still see that as an important plank within the education system. We can see, however, that their policies create a dichotomy between vocational and academic systems and the students who use them.   Within this system, the student is channelled, at sixteen into one path or the other. I fear that there is a potential to create a dichotomy between vocational and academic students  There will be one group of students who have a high level of academic learning with very few vocational and technical skills; while another group are highly skilled vocational workers who have little, or no,  knowledge  of the  culture or political spheres. But, in the real world, an academic student will, eventually, need to get a job. While, the vocational worker will need to understand; cultural, political, technical advances if they are to play a role within civic life


We can see from this discussion that Stephen Twigg, and the party that he represents, sees education being directly linked to the needs of the market. They see education’s prime purpose as providing skilled workers for an increasingly technologically marketplace. So, what does this tell us about Labour’s views of the future. I believes that they see a future that demands workers who are highly skilled and ready to take up posts within a future in which the technical advances keep coming. 


While I believe that this view of education is a worthy one, and I believe that the skills gap is troubling, I think Twigg places an emphasis on this skills set at the detriment of other skills.  It places economic capital, and identity over cultural capital and civic identities.  I fear that this will limit the childs, and future adults, ability to function as a skilled citizen. This policy sees the citizen as a worker, or potential worker.  It is the citizens economic value that counts within this view of the future.


I would argue that a person’s role within society is a multi layered one, that includes; civic, political and cultural aspects.  If we are to have a truly sophisticated egalitarian citizenship that can survive in an ever changing world, we need voters who have knowledge, and the potential to think through, the issues that will arise in an increasingly complex world.